What Happens Between an Arrest and a Criminal Trial in Washington, D.C.?

Is Jail Time Mandatory for 1st DUI in VA? Not if you're acquitted! But there are number of enhancements that can apply to 1st DUIs that can trigger mandatory jail time upon conviction. CALL TO ASK ABOUT DUI JAIL TIME Elevated BAC Under Virginia law, if a driver's blood alcohol content ("BAC") is .15 or greater, mandatory five days minimum jail time is required by law. A Fairfax judge can hand down a higher sentence, however. An experienced DUI attorney may be able to challenge the BAC and get jail off the table in your case. If the BAC is .20 or greater, mandatory 10 days minimum jail time is required by law. Once again, a Fairfax judge can hand down a higher sentence. An experienced DUI attorney may be able to challenge the BAC and get jail off the table in your case. Jail Time Can Happen Even If Not Mandatory Remember this: a Fairfax judge can sentence anyone convicted of a DUI for up to 12 months in jail under VA Code 18.2-226. This could happen for a variety of reasons. Bad facts, an accident or injuries , and prior driving convictions are factors Fairfax judges may consider when deicing whether to impose jail time. Fairfax prosecutors are also increasing DUI enforcement and cops are making more arrests than ever. Standard First DUIs Are Not A Thing Drivers often make the assumption that the DUI plea their friend got is a standard plea that he or she will get. Don't make that assumption. At S.L. England, we don't assume the prosecution can convict you and look to win your case. But if the case is difficult to win, don't assume jail won't be sought by the prosecution.

Getting Evidence Tossed out in a DUI FAIRFAX PD is going hard on DUIs right now, and have increased arrests with a specialized DUI Task Force. CALL TO TALK ABOUT DUIs. DUIs arrests can lead to more charges than just drunk driving. Police often use the DUI to try to find evidence to bring more charges, like possession of guns and drugs. That's what happened in Mr. Nottingham's case. What began as a DUI turned into felony gun charges. Read on. How Do You Suppress Evidence Here's some case law for you. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures, including unreasonable searches and seizures of their automobiles. U.S. Const. amend. IV; South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364, 367 (1976) (identifying automobiles as "within the reach of the Fourth Amendment"). The Supreme Court has stated that warrantless searches and seizures "are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment -subject only to a few specifically established and well delineated exceptions." Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366, 372 (1993) (quoting Thompson v. Louisiana, 469 U.S. 17, 20 (1984) (per curiam)); see also Megel v. Commonwealth, 262 Va. 531, 534 (2001). "One such exception to the general rule requiring a search warrant is when an inventory search of an impounded vehicle is conducted in accord with the policy considerations recognized by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 (1976), and Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433 (1973)." Cantrell, 65 Va.App. at 59 . All of this is to say that when a constitutional right has been violated during some type of traffic stop, you can argue that the evidence should be suppressed. What Happened in the Nottingham Case After dark on the evening of June 18, 2021, Officer Astin of the Virginia Beach Police Department ("VBPD") initiated a traffic stop of Nottingham on Ferrell Parkway (the "highway") in Virginia Beach. Nottingham parked his black sedan on the shoulder of the highway and exited the vehicle at Officer Astin's command. After Nottingham took a preliminary breath test, Officer Astin placed Nottingham under arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol. Officer Astin searched Nottingham incident to that arrest and found a single pill in Nottingham's front right pocket. Nottingham informed Officer Astin that he had a prescription for that pill, which Nottingham identified as ten milligrams of Percocet. Nottingham told Officer Astin, "I'm a sickle cell patient. I have S.C. disease." He explained that he kept the Percocet pill on his person in case he had a sickle-cell-induced pain crisis. Officer Astin then told Nottingham, "I won't charge you with it [possession of a controlled substance] if I find the prescription." Nottingham eventually agreed to let Officer Astin retrieve proof of the Percocet prescription from a bag located on the front passenger seat of his vehicle, but Nottingham told Officer Astin that he did not consent to a search of his vehicle. The police eventually found a gun in the car and charged him with misdemeanor carrying a concealed weapon under Virginia Code 18.2-308 . The cops wanted to keep searching. The Court of Appeals ultimately found that “Officer Astin's conduct and very clear statements demonstrate that he was primarily motivated instead by a desire to search for contraband to determine what charges he could add to the DUI charge for which Nottingham had already been arrested. The result: the gun charges were tossed on appeal. Yes, the DUI wasn't overturned but some DUIs can lead to more charges. If you're arrested for any charge, be prepared to fight anything else the prosecutors might want to throw at you. If you're facing a DUI in Fairfax, Alexandria, Arlington, or any other Virginia Court, CALL TODAY .

Driving Under the Influence (DUI) is a serious offense in Washington, D.C. A DUI is often people's first arrest and encounter with the criminal justice system. The most important call you can make after your arrest is to an experienced criminal defense attorney. At S.L. England, PLLC, we are prepared to aggressively defend your future while giving you the best legal advice we have. CLICK HERE TO SPEAK TO A DUI ATTORNEY NOW. After Your DUI Arrest After you are arrested for DUI, you are taken to one of the seven police districts for processing. You will be fingerprinted and provide a breath sample at this time. If you are arrested on a first offense DUI and your Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) is below 0.20 percent, you will likely be cited and released. You will be given a date when you have to appear before a judge for your arraignment. Washington, D.C. has an implied consent law. If you refuse to submit a breath, blood, or urine sample, you will have your driver's license revoked for one year. If your driver's license was issued in another state, the revocation only applies to your ability to drive in Washington, D.C., but your state's DMV may be notified, and you may face penalties there as well. If you have an urgent medical need while you are at the police station, the police will either treat you at the station with over-the-counter medications or transport you to a hospital. If you are transported to a hospital, you will likely remain there until you can see the judge for your arraignment, usually the next day. The police have the option of holding you overnight, depending on the circumstances of your arrest. If they choose to do this, the police will transport you to Central Booking. This is where everyone who was arrested waits until they are transported to the court for arraignment. This is a holding area, not a jail. Central Booking is located at: 300 Indiana Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20001 At your arraignment, the judge will decide if you can be released on bail or if you must remain incarcerated until your trial. If you cannot post bail, if you are a flight risk, or if you have another pending criminal charge, you will be transported to the Central Detention Facility, where you will remain until your trial. The Central Detention Facility is located at: 1901 D Street SE Washington, D.C. 20003 Courthouses Your DUI case will be prosecuted by the Criminal Section of the Public Safety Division of the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia. Your pre-trial hearings and your trial will be held at the D.C. Superior Court. The courthouse is located at: 500 Indiana Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20001 You are expected to be civil while you are in the courthouse. Disorderly or disruptive behavior is not tolerated at any time, including shouting, arguing, or using aggressive language. The court does not have a specific dress code, but will remove people from the property who wear clothing that distracts from court proceedings. This includes any gang insignia, exposed undergarments, provocative garments, or sheer clothing. Any clothing with words or pictures that make sexual or drug references or that are obscene or intimidating are also prohibited. Food is prohibited in all public areas of the courthouse except in the Courts Cafe on the C Street level. You may not take photographs or make audio recordings of any court proceedings. Electronic devices, including cell phones, tablets, or computers, may not be used in the courtroom. Smoking tobacco or using electronic smoking devices is permitted outside the courthouse at least 25 feet from an entrance. Using drugs, alcohol, or tobacco inside the courthouse is prohibited at all times. Weapons, including firearms, knives, tasers, and pepper spray, are not allowed in the courthouse. Anything that can be used as a weapon is also prohibited. Service animals that meet the criteria set in the Americans with Disabilities Act are welcome. Any violations of these rules can lead to expulsion from the courthouse, being banned from entering any D.C. court building, or arrest. Your attorney will notify you of court dates and accompany you to your hearing. Aggressive, Experienced DUI Representation in Washington, D.C. If you have been charged with DUI in Washington, D.C., the most important call you can make is to an experienced DUI attorney who can provide you with aggressive representation. A DUI conviction can carry consequences that extend beyond jail time and fines. At S.L. England, PLLC, our attorneys have the courtroom experience you need to effectively present your case to a judge or jury. We can represent you in any level court. Call  202-875-5181  or contact us online today.

When you have been pulled over and are suspected of drunk driving, you could be asked to provide a breath sample. Misconceptions exist about what your rights are and what these types of tests are. Misunderstandings can lead to more problems, especially if you are facing DUI charges in DC. CLICK HERE TO SPEAK TO A DUI ATTORNEY NOW. At S.L. England, PLLC, our DUI defense lawyer in District of Columbia helps clients understand all aspects of their drunk driving case. We believe informed clients make better decisions about their DUI case. If you have questions or want to speak to a criminal defense lawyer in DC, call us at  202-875-5181  to schedule a Free Consultation. What Are Breath Tests? Police officers use breath tests in roadside testing and following arrests to help determine whether an alleged drunk driver was under the influence of alcohol while operating a vehicle. These tests can be used for operators of cars and trucks as well as operators of motorcycles, boats, and other vehicles as defined by their respective state. There are two different types of breath tests: the preliminary breath test (PBT) (also known as preliminary alcohol screenings) and the breathalyzer. Both "types" are often simply called "breath tests," and that's where the confusion comes in. By referring to both as breath tests, people assume they are the same thing, but they are not. Each is administered for different reasons and purposes. Preliminary Breath Tests A preliminary breath test or alcohol screening is a breath alcohol test conducted using a portable breath machine in the field, meaning on the side of the road during a traffic stop or DUI investigation. The PBT measures a person's breath alcohol content (BrAC). Portable breath test results are almost always inadmissible in court because they are unreliable. You would want to speak to a drunk driving attorney, however, to make sure what your specific state law says about PBT results and admissibility. PBTs are administered when a police officer has reasonable grounds to believe you are unlawfully intoxicated. Maybe your speech was slurred or your eyes were bloodshot, and so the officer asks to take a breath sample. If you fail the PBT, that could be enough probable cause to arrest you for a drunk driving offense. A PBT result can also be used in conjunction with a failed field sobriety test as sufficient probable cause to arrest you. Breathalyzers After an arrest for a drunk driving offense, you will have to take another test. Typically, this is a chemical test using a breathalyzer. The breathalyzer is not a portable machine and produces results that are more accurate and can be admitted into court as evidence against you. Approved breathalyzer machines are subject to calibration requirements established by state or federal law. Before you provide a breath sample via a breathalyzer, the officer should have read the Miranda warning to you. Miranda warnings advise you of your rights. If this warning was not provided to you prior to a breathalyzer test, your constitutional rights may have been violated. Do I Have a Right to Refuse a Breath Test in District of Columbia? Whether you are in District of Columbia or anywhere else in DC, you can refuse a breath test in either situation. Breath tests using portable machines in the field are typically voluntary while tests used at the police station while in police custody are not voluntary. You can, however, still refuse either one. Keep in mind, though, that you should be ready for consequences stemming from the refusal. Immediate consequences include administrative penalties while long-term consequences are those that may result in a criminal conviction. All states have their own variation of implied consent laws. These laws basically say that you implicitly agree to obey the rules of the road when you get a driver's license. As such, you also implicitly agree to any chemical tests (breath, blood, or urine tests) in exchange for the privilege of operating a vehicle in the state. If you refuse, the state's agency for motor vehicles can impose an automatic license suspension and fines against you. You do not have to be charged and convicted of a drunk driving offense to have your license suspended -- you just need to refuse a breath test. What's more, in some jurisdictions, your refusal may be used against you in court as evidence that you were drunk driving. If you are convicted, your sentence could include jail time. Further, if you refuse, the officer may request a warrant to obtain a blood sample. Blood tests are much more reliable and accurate. If you were arrested in District of Columbia, you should speak to a drunk driving defense lawyer who handles both administrative and criminal DUI cases. Administratively, you can appeal an automatic license suspension if, for example, the police failed to warn you of the consequences. Criminally, you can fight DUI-related charges and be successful. Common Problems with the Breath Tests in DC Breath tests using portable machines are known to be unreliable, and that's why they are typically not admissible in court. Breath tests using breathalyzers at the police station, however, are admissible. They, too, can also be unreliable and become inadmissible under certain situations or circumstances. Problems with breathalyzers can be categorized as those resulting from the testing device or machine, the individual operating the device, or the test sample. Problems with the Breathalyzer Device Improper calibration Incorrect chemical solutions Inappropriate modification Faulty programming Broken or otherwise not maintained properly Issues with the Administration of the Test Failure to read Miranda Warnings Improper instructions or methodology Failure to follow testing protocols Testing performed by an untrained person Causes of Improper Breathalyzer Test Readings Pre-existing conditions or other medical conditions suffered by the test taker Medications, foods, or drinks Residual alcohol from the test taker's mouth Certain diets, like Keto Breath tests can be challenged. A criminal defense lawyer can file motions to suppress or exclude the results. Sometimes, if successful, this could result in dismissal of the charges or an acquittal. Five Ways We Challenge DUI Breath Tests in District of Columbia A breath test is often a substantial part of the prosecution's case involving DUI offenses. For that reason, it is essential to ensure that a breath test was performed correctly and the results are accurate.DUI defense attorneys who have been well trained and have experience in these cases can identify a problem with a breath test and take proper action to suppress it as evidence. At The Law Office of S.L. England, PLLC, we can take any of the following actions, depending on the specific facts and circumstances of your case: Attack the reliability of the breath test . Many reasons exist why we may not be able to rely on the results of a breath test, like a faulty machine, improper administration, or health issues with the test taker. Prove the breath device was not properly calibrated. Each state has its respective laws on calibration, but it usually involves a certified forensic analyst and verification of the machine's accuracy. Prove device was not properly maintained. Typically, the date and time of repairs and maintenance, as well as the nature and extent of and who performed the maintenance and repairs must be logged. Prove there was a lack of training or an operator's error. Police must be trained in order to conduct breath tests. An untrained or uncertified police officer may not properly administer the test. Prove records were not properly maintained. Records should be kept to show proper calibration and maintenance, and failure to keep those records updated can be used to prove the device was not properly calibrated or maintained as the law requires.  During the discovery phase of your criminal case, we will obtain the information and evidence we need to support arguments against the breath test's admissibility. Contact a DUI Defense Lawyer in District of Columbia Today You can have your day in court to challenge DUI charges regardless if you took and failed a breath test or refused one. With the right DUI defense lawyer in District of Columbia, you can be successful. Contact The Law Office of S.L. England, PLLC today by calling us at  202-875-5181  or filling out an online form to schedule a Free Consultation. We will review your case and discuss your best legal options.

When someone is charged with driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (DUI) in Washington D.C., it may seem like there is no way to defend the charges. However, nothing could be further from the truth. There are any number of lines of attack when it comes to challenging a DUI charge. Having an experienced criminal defense attorney by your side can make all the difference. CLICK HERE TO SPEAK TO A DUI ATTORNEY NOW. Of course, not every defense applies to every case. While this blog post discusses various options a defense attorney will consider when examining a criminal case, each case is different. Each case presents its own set of facts from which the attorney works, finding the defense that is right for each individual case. Below are some of the most common DUI defenses. Challenging the Basis of the Stop in DC The police cannot just stop a car at random to see if the person driving the car has been drinking or is under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Instead, they must have a legal basis to stop someone who is driving. If, for example, a person is speeding, weaving over the center line, or stopped at a green light, these are all reasons police may legally pull someone over. However, it is not enough to just review the police reports, looking for a legal basis. Many times, in this day and age, the squad car is equipped with a dash camera. In those cases, a qualified criminal defense attorney will also review the dash camera footage to confirm the alleged driver misconduct actually occurred. If the stop of the car was illegal, any evidence obtained after the stop must be suppressed. Challenging the Length of a Traffic Stop Once a car is legally pulled over, the police are required to issue any ticket and let the driver get back on the road. They are not allowed to poke around, looking for additional things to ticket someone for. If someone is pulled over for speeding, for example, the police can't ask a driver to get out of the car and perform field sobriety tests, unless, upon stopping the car and having contact with the driver, they discover some legal basis to ask for the driver to perform such tests. In each case, a criminal defense attorney will evaluate the information the police had at each step of the encounter. If there is not a legal basis to detain someone beyond the original basis of the stop, all evidence discovered beyond the legal detention must be suppressed. Challenging the Chain of Custody For breath tests, a person is taken to the police station and asked to blow into a machine. However, when police collect blood or urine and send it off for testing, the chain of custody of the sample can be challenged. From the time the fluid leaves the body until the time the test result is obtained and interpreted, the government must be able to establish the identity of each and every person who handled the sample. In addition, the government must establish the integrity of the sample. In other words, police may not, for example, collect a tube of blood and keep it in the glove box for a few days before bringing the blood tube to a lab for testing. Failure to establish a complete and proper chain of custody can call into question the legitimacy of the sample, and may lead to suppression of the evidence. Challenging the Test Results - Collection Additionally, the collection process itself is subject to legal challenge. Did the person collecting the blood have the necessary legal qualifications to take blood in this type of situation? Did they use the proper blood tube when collecting the sample? What is the expiration date on the blood tube? Was an alcohol wipe used to clean the skin prior to taking the blood? How was the blood stored between the time of collection and the time of testing? All of these questions can expose potential problems with sample handling that could result in questions about the integrity of the sample. Without a legally sufficient test result, the government's DUI case may be compromised to the extent a dismissal is the only legal solution. Challenging the Test Results – Instrumentation When someone is charged with DUI, most often there is a test, either of blood, breath, or urine, indicating a blood alcohol concentration. This blood alcohol concentration, (BAC) is used by the government to establish how intoxicated a person was, under the legal standard, where 0.08 is the “legal limit.” However, the instruments measuring the BAC of blood, breath, or urine, are not magical. Instead, they are instruments that must be properly cared for. They must be maintained within certain standards. For example, the instruments must be calibrated at certain intervals to make certain they are working properly. If the instruments are not properly maintained, the results may not be reliable. In the right case, challenging the test results can lead to a dismissal of the charges. Challenging the Test Results – Margin of Error In every measurement, there is “measurement error” that must be accounted for. All instruments are subject to measurement error, meaning there is a predictable margin of error for each measurement. For example, a blood alcohol test may be accurate, plus or minus 0.01. If a blood alcohol concentration is 0.08, and the margin of error is 0.01, then the test result is more accurately 0.07 – 0.09. Understanding and challenging measurement error can make a difference in certain DUI cases. Every DC DUI Case is Different Because every case is different, it is essential that an attorney experienced in DUI cases carefully review the facts and circumstances of each individual case to determine what errors might be present. At S.L. England, PLLC, we know the intricacies of DUI law and we know how to challenge DUI evidence. Contact us today to discuss your needs for legal representation. We are ready to fight for you.

Stay informed with the latest updates on criminal cases, public safety measures, and ongoing investigations in Washington, D.C. 📰 Major Criminal Cases Gang-Related Triple Homicide Convictions Four men were convicted for a 2021 gang-related shooting in Brightwood Park that left three dead and three others wounded. The violence stemmed from a rivalry between the Riggs Park Crew and Kennedy Street Crew. Sentencing is scheduled for October 2025. 🔗 Full Story – Washington Post Capitol Intern Fatally Shot in Drive-By Eric Tarpinian-Jachym, a 21-year-old congressional intern, was fatally shot near the Walter E. Washington Convention Center. Authorities believe he was not the intended target, and the suspects had opened fire on another group. This marks D.C.'s 85th homicide in 2025. 🔗 Full Story – Washington Post Life Sentence for Capitol Rioter Edward Kelley, previously pardoned for his involvement in the January 6 Capitol attack, received a life sentence for plotting to attack an FBI office and assassinate law enforcement. These new crimes were not covered by his prior pardon. 🔗 Full Story – The Guardian 🚨 Public Safety Measures Extended Youth Curfew D.C. has expanded its youth curfew in response to rising late-night incidents. The curfew now applies to 17-year-olds and begins at 11 p.m. Officers are required to issue two warnings before enforcement. 🔗 Full Story – Axios Pretrial Detention Powers Extended The D.C. Council voted to extend pretrial detention policies through 2026, allowing for expanded detention of individuals charged with violent offenses. Critics warn of potential unintended consequences. 🔗 Full Story – Washington Post 🔍 Ongoing Investigations Suspect Arrested in Shooting of Food Network Star Devin Spivey, 21, was arrested for the shooting of celebrity chef Tobias Dorzon in a robbery and ambush that occurred seven months ago. Dorzon was shot and robbed of $100,000 in valuables. 🔗 Full Story – The Sun For more updates on criminal law and defense strategies in the D.C. and Northern Virginia region, contact our office or follow our blog regularly. 

According to this REPORT , a former prosecutor got blood alcohol evidence from an intoxalyzer thrown out against her because the officer didn't do a 20 minute observation before doing the test. Reasons like this are why you need good legal defense if you're facing a DUI charge.

🚨 DUI & Reckless Driving Roundup – June 7, 2025 Covering Washington, D.C. & Northern Virginia 🔹 Washington, D.C. 🚓 Early Morning DUI Arrest in Adams Morgan A 29-year-old woman was arrested at 18th St NW and Columbia Rd around 3:45 AM after allegedly running a red light and nearly hitting a pedestrian. She failed a field sobriety test and registered a 0.14% BAC on scene. Her vehicle was impounded, and she's facing DUI and reckless endangerment charges. Source: MPD Adult Arrests Data 🧯 Georgetown: Reckless Driving on M Street NW An off-duty federal contractor was stopped for driving at excessive speeds and weaving through traffic near M St and Wisconsin Ave NW. Witnesses reported aggressive driving and near-collisions. The driver was charged with reckless driving and cited for expired registration. Source: SpotCrime Georgetown Reports 🔹 Northern Virginia 🛑 Fairfax County: DUI Crash Near Burke Centre Parkway A 40-year-old male was charged with DUI after crashing into a retaining wall near Burke Centre Parkway. According to FCPD, he admitted to consuming alcohol at a nearby restaurant. No injuries were reported. The driver was released on bond pending arraignment. Source: Fairfax County Police Reports 🚗 Prince William County: DWI Checkpoint Results An overnight DWI checkpoint near Dale City led to 3 arrests and 11 citations. Charges included two DWI offenses and one possession of an open container. The checkpoint was part of the county's “Summer Safe Roads” initiative. Source: Prince William County Police Department 📌 Weekend Safety Reminder 🚨 Sobriety checkpoints will continue tonight (Friday) and Saturday in: Washington, D.C. (Pennsylvania Ave SE) Alexandria (Route 1 Corridor) Fairfax (Braddock Rd near GMU) 📢 Plan ahead. Call a ride. Don't risk your license or your life.

🚔 DUI & Reckless Driving Roundup – June 6, 2025 Covering Washington, D.C. & Northern Virginia 🔹 Washington, D.C. 🚨 Woman Arrested After DUI Crash Near Capitol Hill At approximately 2:15 AM, D.C. police responded to a single-vehicle crash at 3rd and East Capitol St NE. A 34-year-old woman was arrested for DUI after allegedly striking a traffic signal pole. No injuries were reported. The driver refused a breathalyzer and was transported to the 1st District station for processing. 🛑 MPD Checkpoints Target Impaired Drivers This Weekend The Metropolitan Police Department announced increased DUI enforcement this Friday and Saturday night in Southeast D.C. near Pennsylvania Ave and Minnesota Ave. Officers will be conducting sobriety checkpoints from 9 PM to 3 AM. 🔹 Northern Virginia 🧊 Arlington: DWI Arrest After Suspicious Vehicle Call Arlington County Police arrested a 27-year-old man near Columbia Pike and S. Dinwiddie St. after responding to a call about a vehicle stopped in the middle of the road with its engine running. The driver was found asleep behind the wheel and charged with DWI and reckless driving. ⚠️ Fairfax County: Reckless Driving Over 100 MPH on I-66 A 22-year-old driver was arrested in Centreville for reckless driving after being clocked at 107 MPH on I-66. Virginia State Police confirmed the driver had a previous reckless driving conviction and was additionally charged with operating on a suspended license. 🔹 Noteworthy Court Action 🏛 Alexandria DUI Sentencing: Repeat Offender Gets 9 Months An Alexandria man with two prior DWI convictions was sentenced Thursday to nine months in jail following a January arrest near King Street Metro. The judge cited “clear disregard for public safety” in rejecting probation. 📌 Safety Reminder Heading out this weekend? DUI checkpoints will be active across D.C., Arlington, and Fairfax. Plan a ride, not a risk.